Ground the report in evidence
Connect the submitted domain and scam evidence to the affected organization and the deceptive activity.
Fraudulent email can borrow your customer’s name to make a payment request or business instruction look real. CyberATS works the domain and provider response.
A domain used for impersonation email can be harmful even when its web page is empty. The relevant evidence and providers can differ from a website phishing case.
CyberATS uses an email-scam response to assess the submitted evidence, identify the domain and mail infrastructure, and pursue the appropriate reporting channels.
Discuss this use caseFictional example. The evidence and response depend on the case.
Use the case information to pursue the infrastructure enabling the fraudulent messages.
Connect the submitted domain and scam evidence to the affected organization and the deceptive activity.
Identify the domain and mail infrastructure involved and route reports to the appropriate abuse channels.
Follow the infrastructure response and case activity. A blank website alone is not treated as proof that an email scam has stopped.
Domain remediation complements your work on payment verification, recipient warnings, and mailbox investigation. It does not replace the controls your customer needs to respond to a business email scam.
See the full processProvide the scam domain and the supporting information required for the threat type, such as the fraudulent message evidence. The dashboard and API expose the submission requirements.
No. Email-scam domains can be assessed and worked without a malicious web page.
No. CyberATS pursues the abusive domain and infrastructure. Inbox actions and account remediation remain part of your separate incident response.
Discuss the threats you handle, the evidence you collect, and the service you want to deliver.